Sixth-Generation Warfare in American Strategy: The Proxy War in Ukraine as a Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61279/x842n817Keywords:
wars, sixth-generation warfare, Ukraine, United States, RussiaAbstract
This research aims to study sixth-generation wars in terms of their characteristics, objectives, and what distinguishes them from fifth-generation wars, as well as their role in American strategy. The research addresses the concept of proxy warfare, its importance in shaping public policies, and its impact on political, economic, and military decisions. It also analyzes how the United States uses this approach to face challenges and achieve its goals and interests without direct engagement in combat.
The research relies on the Russia-Ukraine war as a model of a sixth-generation war, where Washington supports Kyiv militarily, logistically, and through intelligence to weaken the Russian adversary without deploying American troops directly. Digital technologies, cyberspace, and drones have contributed to enhancing the capacity of proxy actors to operate effectively. The study draws lessons that can help understand the development of the American military doctrine towards asymmetric warfare. Finally, the research offers specific recommendations regarding the tools of indirect warfare, including media and cyber warfare, and the integration of these tools into national security strategies.
Downloads
References
1. Qasim Muhammad Abd Hiba Ghaleb Kamel, Smart Power in US Foreign Policy after 2017, Dar Amna for Printing and Publishing, Jordan, 1st ed., 2024.
2. Alvin and Heidi Toffler, War and Anti-War: Survival at the Dawn of the 21st Century, Little, Brown and Company, 1993.
3. Hammes, T.X. “The Sling and the Stone: On War in the 21st Century”, 2004
4. Slipchenko, Vladimir, "Generations of Wars and the Evolution of Their Strategies," Russian Journal of Strategic Studies, 1999.
5. Sleptschenko, Vladimir, “Sixth Generation Wars,” Military Thought Journal, Issue 2, 2000.
6. Rid, T. “Cyber War Will Not Take Place”, 2013.
7. Al-Marsal,"WhatAreSixth-GenerationWars?" https://www.almrsal.com/post/902710
8. Kott, Alexander, “Toward Sixth-Generation Military Intelligence,” The MITRE Corporation, 2019.
9. Tikrit Journal of Political Science, "Sixth-Generation Wars: Concept and Applications," Issue 28, 2022.
10. Hamza Al-Salem, "Differences Between Generations of Wars," Strategic Thought Center for Studies, 2021
11. Al-Rodhan, Nayef, “The Future of War: From Fifth to Sixth Generation”, Geopolitical Monitor, 2020.
12. Kreps, S. “Proxy Wars and the US Strategy”, 2015.
13. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. Basic Books, 1997.
14. U.S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report, 2006.
15. Defense Innovation Board, AI Principles: Recommendations on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence by the Department of Defense, 2019
16. Bensahel, Nora. The Future of Proxy Warfare. Center for a New American
17. Rauta, Vladimir. “Proxy Warfare and the Future of Conflict.” The RUSI Journal, 2021.
18. Jones, Seth G. America’s Role in Nation-Building: From Germany to Iraq. RAND Corporation, 2003
19. Rid, Thomas. Cyber War Will Not Take Place. Oxford University Press, 2013.
20. Prier, Jarred. “Commanding the Trend: Social Media as Information Warfare.” Strategic Studies Quarterly, 2017
21. Singer, P. W. Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century. Penguin, 2009.
22. U.S. Space Command Strategy, 2020.
23. Arango, Tim. “Syrian Kurds Say U.S. Let Turks Push Them Out.” The New York Times, 2019.
24. Barno, David, and Bensahel, Nora. “The Twilight of the American Military Presence in Afghanistan.” War on the Rocks, 2021.
25. Chivvis, Christopher S. Toppling Qaddafi: Libya and the Limits of Liberal Intervention. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
26. Zenko, Micah. Reforming U.S. Drone Strike Policies. Council on Foreign Relations, 2013.
27. Fontes, R., & Kamminga, J. Ukraine: A Living Lab for AI Warfare. National Defense Magazine. (2023).
28. Hornung, J. W. Ukraine Is Now a Proxy War for Asian Powers. RAND Corporation. (2024).
29. BBC ANAIYSIS,UKRAINES STRATEGIC INFORMATION WAR,2023.
30. Miller, C. The lesson for America from ‘Spiderweb’ and the drone wars. Financial Times. (2025).
31. Vandier, P. NATO needs to get ready for modern war — and fast, top commander tells BI. Business Insider. (2025).
32. Fontes, R., & Kamminga, J. The sixth domain: The role of the private sector in warfare. Atlantic Council. (2023).
33. Business Insider. Ukraine’s drone swarm attack was a warning for Russia and the US may be next. (2025).
34. Mumford, A. The Return of Great-Power Proxy Wars. War on the Rocks(2021).
35. U.S. Army War College. The Russo-Ukrainian War: Protracted Warfare Implications for the U.S. Army. Association of the United States Army (AUSA). (2023).
36. U.S. Army War College. Ukraine and Proxy War: Improving Ontological Shortcomings in Military Thinking. Association of the United States Army (AUSA). (2023).
37. Small Wars Journal. Non-Linear Warfare in Ukraine: The Critical Role of Information Operations and Special Operations. (2023).
38. Eurasia Review. Lessons from Ukraine for the Future of War – Analysis. (2023).
39. Military-Trade. Sixth Generation Warfare: The Future of Conflict in a Hyper-Connected World. (2025).
40. Congressional Budget Office, 2024
41. Engelsberg Ideas. Ukraine and the West: an alliance by proxy. (2024).
42. Interpret: China. Evolving Forms of War: A Perspective from the Ukraine Crisis (2023).
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Any data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Law and Political Science College
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
